"Congratulations San Francisco, you've ruined pizza! First the Hawaiians, and now YOU!" |
Emotions are at the core of us as human beings, so it comes
no surprise that eventually they would become the topic of cinema, featuring
prominently in Peter Docter’s (Monsters
Inc., Up) latest directorial
effort, Inside Out. But no one could
have predicted that such an unusual concept could ever make such a
thought-provoking film, especially when you consider that this is an animation,
where literal emotive creatures control our actions. Yes, Anger, Disgust, Fear,
Sadness and Joy, man a control panel where a few clicks or lever-pulling can
result in us throwing vegetables at our parents or managing to pull off a
perfect skating move on the ice.
Set in San Francisco, Inside
Out documents the move of the Andersen family from their home-town, icy
Minnesota, prompting Riley (Kaitlyn Dias) to be uprooted from her ice-hockey
loving life and placed in a place where she has no friends, no hobbies and an unsuitably
shabby home. This would be enough to annoy anyone, but Riley is determined to
stay strong and joyful for her mother (Diane Lane), whilst her father (Kyle
MacLachlan) struggles to spend time with her due to work commitments. The
emotional strain on Riley’s joy causes her emotions to go into haywire, and
when Sadness (Phyllis Smith) inadvertently causes the ejection of Joy (Amy
Poehler) and herself from ‘headquarters’, the two find themselves trapped and
needing to find a way back home, quick. Left to rule the control panel, Disgust
(Mindy Kaling), Anger (Lewis Black) and Fear (Bill Hader) can’t cope, and
ultimately cause unimaginable chaos.
It should be noted that the psychological complexity of Inside Out is a particular marvel; never
before has a film marketed as a children’s feature been so thoroughly
insightful and provocative. The portrayal of what is more commonly known as
mixed emotions as normal is reassuring for those who often don’t feel one
particular feeling at any given time. The presentation of these compounded
emotions is highly significant in the place of Riley’s mind, as while the
little people inside her mind struggle, so does she, mimicking the ways in
which the brain affect our own actions.
The ways in which the film can be seen in relation to mental
health is extremely interesting as ultimately, although Riley has no physical
injuries, her mind affects her in such a state that she is willing to run away
from home, risking her ‘Islands of Personality’ (family, hockey, goof-ball, honesty
and friendship), and not to mention her very sense of being. This draws a
strong parallel to several mental disorders such as depression, with Sadness
(Phyllis Smith) seeming almost unable to stop herself from turning everything
into a state of sadness, with Joy left fumbling in the background.
Ultimately however, the main point of the film is not that
we need to eradicate sadness and block it out, but to accept it and the role it
plays in our lives. The relationship between Joy and Sadness is one of the most
touching ever between two animated characters, with poignant scenes between the
two, propelled by the compelling performances of Poehler and Smith. Joy and
Sadness finally realise that they can work together to help Riley, as opposed
to being polar opposites, and the two emotions bond together to create
something that is exceptionally profound for an animated movie. In this case,
it seems that animation is doing a better job at succeeding in expressing
severe and bitter-sweet emotions than some live-action features, and Docter is
able to convey this beautifully on-screen.
The contrast between the bright and magical colours and the decidedly
darker nature of the film is particularly intriguing, providing a notable
parallel between what we see and what lies under the surface, echoing the films
overall concept. Everything from joy’s hazy complexion to the impressive
long-term memory structure has been carefully planned and designed, ensuring
that the film’s aesthetic is sure to dazzle any audience.
Whilst Disney Pixar’s has had some success with former
addition Up, it felt too overdrawn
and bizarre in places, whereas Inside Out
is a far more inclusive feature, touching on subjects that are relatable to all
ages; truly understanding the concept of a ‘family’ movie. The film seems to
have marked the return of Pixar to its former glory, green-lighting the
possibility for more experimental, concept-pieces in the future.
A truly emotional ride (on the ‘train of thought’), Inside Out is unique in its concept, wonderfully
envisioned and bursting with imagination and, yes, joy.